On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:12:35PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > > Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream. > > > Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having a fix > > > upstream would imho make sense. > > > > Because it was just a hack :) > > > > Maybe Lennart's idea with the sysv generator is a better thing. > > So, I have discussed this with Kay, David, Daniel, and co. And we > kinda came to the conclusion that we might as well just drop the > configurability where runlevel3-5.target point to. If we drop that, we > can just keep them as symlink aliases in place, but the sysv > generator won't create symlinks in them anymore. Instead it will > create the right links directly in multi-user.target and > graphical.target as necessary. > > I think that would be the simplest, easiest solution for the > problem. Redefining runlevels in the systemd context is kinda a crazy > idea, and we should probably just say goodbye to it... I am retty sure > pretty much nobody made use of this anyway. If that works, than I'm +1.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel