On Tue, 17.02.15 06:53, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > В Mon, 16 Feb 2015 23:59:56 +0100 > Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> пишет: > > > > > * When a .mount unit refers to a mount point on which multiple > > mounts are stacked, and the .mount unit is stopped all of > > the stacked mount points will now be unmounted until no > > mount point remains. > > > > Does it mean that in either of below case > > mount something-else /foo > systemctl start foo.mount
In this case the second line is a NOP, since the first line already mounted something on /foo, and thus made foo.mount active. (Also, small hint, you can just write "systemctl start /foo", it will be implicitly converted to "systemctl start foo.mount".) > > and > > systemctl start foo.mount > mount something-else /foo This one will result in too mounts one on top of the other. > systemctl stop foo.mount will also unmount something-else? Correct. In the first case a single mount is removed, in the second case two mounts will actually be removed. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
