On 2015-03-05 at 19:16 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:09:54PM +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: > > On 2015-02-26 at 02:53 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: > > > On 2015-02-26 at 02:46 +0300, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: > > > > Hi there. > > > > > > > > These patches allow using firstboot and sysusers together to construct > > > > an > > > > initramfs with a fully functional emergency.service and rescue.service. > > > > > > > > Moreover, they allow to build a "clean" passwd for the initramfs and > > > > don't > > > > resort to copying it from the host system (as it has been done in Arch's > > > > mkinitcpio). > > > > > > > > The first one allows sysusers to take configuration from the real root > > > > but to apply it to a specified alternate root. > > > > > > > > The next two patches fix an apparent integration problem between > > > > firstboot > > > > and sysusers, as previously described here: > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-February/028355.html > > > > > > > > All in all, with this series I'm able to do a simple > > > > > > > > systemd-firstboot --root="$BUILDROOT" --root-password="" > > > > systemd-sysusers --dest-root="$BUILDROOT" > > > > > > > > and, after adding respective units and /sbin/sulogin to the initramfs, > > > > to use "rd.systemd.unit=rescue.target" as a complete alternative to > > > > pre-systemd > > > > arch-specific "break=premount" kernel parameter. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Forgot to add Dave Reisner to Cc:. > > > > > > Dave, what do you think about all this? If this is a bad idea, then I'm > > > open for suggestions. > > > I just miss these "break=..." from the pre-systemd era. > > > > > > > Anyone? > 2/3 and 3/3 look fine. For 1/3 I was wondering if it wouldn't be simpler > to simply copy the sysuser files into the tree. The semantics are then > clear. But right now, if there are sysuser files in the source root, and > in the destination root, it becomes unclear how to sort and merge them.
Well, the intended semantics are pretty clear as well: simply ignore configs everywhere except the --config-root. (Just like we ignore configs in / when --root is given, for example.) Yes, copying/symlinking sysusers.d directories or individual files into the initramfs build root is less intrusive from the code perspective. But what if people add their own sysusers.d (people tend to have crazy setups...)? That'll need to be worked around. OTOH, the proposed changes are quite simple, and if needed, people with strange setups could just rm the generated files. However, no strong preference. -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
