On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 10:33:19PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 PM, <j...@joshtriplett.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:55:38AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> 2015-03-05 11:58 GMT+01:00 <har...@redhat.com>: > >> > From: Harald Hoyer <har...@redhat.com> > >> > > >> > The speedup is significant > >> > > >> > Original libtool > >> > $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4 > >> > […] > >> > real 6m4.104s > >> > user 13m49.234s > >> > sys 7m37.864s > >> > > >> > Original libtool + dolt > >> > $ ccache -C && make clean && time make -j4 > >> > […] > >> > real 2m24.869s > >> > user 7m30.198s > >> > sys 1m17.813s > >> > >> Hm, the speedup is nowhere near as significant here: > >> without dolt (make): > >> real 4m2.749s > >> user 3m9.304s > >> sys 0m19.032s > >> > >> with dolt (make): > >> real 3m33.756s > >> user 2m59.476s > >> sys 0m17.632s > >> > >> without dolt (make -j6): > >> real 1m42.001s > >> user 5m3.680s > >> sys 0m26.608s > >> > >> with dolt (make -j6) > >> real 1m35.267s > >> user 4m50.956s > >> sys 0m24.724s > >> > >> > >> libtool version is 2.4.2. > > > > That's more what I'd expect with current versions of libtool, which has > > supposedly fixed many of the issues that motivated the creation of dolt > > in the first place. > > Maybe it was a regression in libtool from 2.4.2 <-> 2.4.5? I have 2.4.5 here: > > make -j6, libtool > real 4m53.924s > user 11m4.323s > sys 0m54.880s > > make -j6, dolt > real 1m58.653s > user 6m20.523s > sys 0m28.920s
Interesting. How easily can you try 2.4.2? - Josh Triplett _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel