Reindl Harald [2015-04-08 10:32 +0200]: > nobody needs to ability to cancel a fsck because hardly anybody has a > insight if the moment doing so is horrible dangerous and givne that fsck > don't run for fun why would you want to interrupt it and risk data loss?
You don't risk data loss by interrupting a routine check (that still happens on ext[234] every so often). But anyway, I don't mind much dropping the cancel ability, but we do want a proper progress report. fsck can take an effing long time with large spinning rust, and without progress report users will just consider the boot hanging/broken and switch off the machine. That's a lot riskier :-) Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
