On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: > We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on > using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. ... > gdbus.c > - g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync() > - 50 x g_dbus_proxy_call_sync() > > sdbus.c > - sd_bus_open_system() > - 50 x sd_bus_get_property()
If you want to "compare apples with apples", I suggest using the lower-level g_bus_get() and g_dbus_connection_call[_sync]() instead of GDBusProxy. The design and priorities of sd-bus and GDBus are not really very similar, but GDBusProxy is certainly not the closest equivalent you can get. Also, if your application profile is such that (a) D-Bus is a significant factor in performance, and (b) sending 50 synchronous D-Bus messages per connection is anywhere near realistic, then you are probably not using D-Bus the way it is designed to be used. See also <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus/13663>. -- Simon McVittie Collabora Ltd. <http://www.collabora.com/> _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
