On Sun, 03.05.15 19:10, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Víctor Fernández <vfr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok, Thanks for your reply. > > > > But, just out of curiosity, why init process gets down with a SIGABRT and > > not with a SIGKILL (9), being this a signal which cannot be caught, blocked > > or ignored? > > > > pid 1 is allowed to catch SIGKILL, and usually does so, so that you can > sigkill everything (e.g. Alt+SysRq+I) and still have a working system > afterwards.
Hmm, it is allowed to do catch SIGKILL? That would be news to me, and systemd certainly doesn't. Do you have any reference? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
