On Wed, 13.05.15 16:39, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 13.05.15 15:21, jsyna...@redhat.com (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > From: Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com> > > > > Hmm, do we really need two options for this? I mean, since -e would > > only ever be combined with start, and -d only with stop it could as > > well be a single option that works for both? > > > > Would be less of a problem if subcommands could have their own options > separate from global ones...
Why? I think either way it's a good idea to be conservative with adding options to systemctl. Also, even if there were per-verb options, then I'd still believe that it would be a bad idea to overload the same option for different verbs, to avoid confusion... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
