On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 16:35 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 15.05.15 16:32, Pavel Odvody (podv...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 15:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Thu, 07.05.15 17:47, Pavel Odvody (podv...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, can you quickly explain how tags and refs and digests relate? > > > > > > If refs replace tags in v2, then I figure we can also drop the > > > dkr_tag_is_valid() definition from the headers, no? > > > > > > Lennart > > > > > > > Both are references to an image - tags can be changed at any time, while > > the digest is unique to the given manifest (immutable). > > And what is a ref precisely? > > Is "ref" supposed to be a generic term for "digest" or "tag", the way > git defines this? > > Lennart >
Yep, short for "ref"erence. -- Pavel Odvody <podv...@redhat.com> Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience 5EC1 95C1 8E08 5BD9 9BBF 9241 3AFA 3A66 024F F68D Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel