On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 14:06 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 19.05.15 14:15, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote: > > As for Evert's original problem, I think it's that RESTART is propagated > > to all RequiredBy units unconditionally - even if those are currently > > stopped! This affects both Requires= and Requisite= in exactly the same
> Hmm, so basically you are saying that currently RESTART is propagated > as RESTART to all depending units, but you suggest that it should be > propagated as TRY_RESTART? Did I get this right? Yes, I think that should fix it. I feel that a TRY_RESTART style true restart would be a more natural base operation than the current "either start or restart" one, with the START_OR_RESTART for "systemctl restart" semantics collapsing to either START or RESTART. With that terminology, the logic would simply be that RESTART is propagated, START is not. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
