BOn Tue, 26.05.15 16:58, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > > 50 non-backport patches? That sounds like a lot... > > It's not that bad, most of them are trivial, like tweaking tmpfiles.d > or some extra historic udev rules. We have quite a bunch of patches to > get rid of Fedora/RedHat-isms and replace them with Debianisms, and > then there's a lot for having a non-merged /usr (which Debian didn't > do yet). Aside from two or three which keep breaking most of them just > tag along, but there's always enough noise to break completely > automatically building packages from git master. Anyway, this is > completely tangential.. :-)
But note that upstream is supposed to be non-redhat centric, and is supposed to support non-merged /usr. If it's really about that, I#d be inetersted to know what these patches are about, and maybe we can move some upstream. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
