В Sat, 30 May 2015 21:36:02 +0800 cee1 <fykc...@gmail.com> пишет:
> Hi all, > > Which service type should a socket activated service be? > 1. For systemd-udevd.service and systemd-journald.service, they are notify > type > 2. For dbus.service, it is simple type > It can be any type. notify is always preferred if started program supports it. > Does socket activation handles the timeout case? > E.g. A.service connects to B.socket, but B.service spends a long time > to be ready, may cause A.service receives ETIMEDOUT? > I suppose it is possible with Accept=false. With Accept=true connection is accepted by systemd itself. > When the service is activated, systemd will still listen to the socket > but do nothing for incoming data, right? > Yes for Accept=false. For Accept=true it is always systemd which accepts connection. > BTW, netstat -lp shows only systemd is listening to a socket, but not > show the one who also is listening to the socket, e.g. > """ > unix 2 [ ACC ] SEQPACKET LISTENING 326 1/systemd > /run/udev/control > """ > Curious why? > I think it is more netstat issue, apparently it shows the first process it finds. > > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
