On 06/10/2015 04:35 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 10.06.15 16:20, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>Without proper infrastructure ( or at least the wills to acquire such ) how
>can you ( or any of us for that matter ) with a straight face advocate for
>consolidation and call systemd the modern building block of an OS ( which
>arguably means this is second component to the Linux kernel ) and sell
>distribution and companies that it should be what they rely on?
>
>All these years we have work hard on all distribution and embedded switch to
>us, rely on us and when push comes to shove we go "meh" we have no intention
>to go to the next level to properly support you?
Yeah, we have no intention to turn systemd into a company or
foundation. Sorry.
Is that a requirement?
Can we not survive through funds and donation?
As far as I know the linux kernel is neither an company nor a foundation
and somehow they manage do they not?
JBG
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel