Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> writes: > On Mon, 22.06.15 14:49, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Lukáš Nykrýn <lnyk...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200: >> >> Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or >> >> network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it >> >> actually is. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> > >> > If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts >> > and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target. >> >> I'm sure it should, but I don't see any evidence that it really is. My >> mnt-nfs.mount that was generated by the fstab generator is ordered >> before remote-fs.target, which is correct. However, I can't find any >> dependency between remote-fs.target, and network*. I'm quite puzzled how >> NFS mounts mounted on boot can actually work correctly right now. > > There's also remote-fs-pre.target. That's ordered before all NFS > mounts, and that's what the online stuff should be ordered before.
All seems to be in order when the system is booting up. However, during shutdown, the order in which network* and remote* are taken down seems to be incorrect. If you could take a look at [1], that would help a bit, since I'm really clueless right now. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214466 Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel