Hello, On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:43 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is automatically >> added to the unit constraints. >> >> Why is "Requires=machine.slice" not prefered instead ? > > Usually "Wants=" is preferred as it makes the units more fail-safe. > Especially for slices, I cannot see why "Requires=" would be > beneficial. If a specific unit needs this, a simple > "Requires=foobar.slice" gets you what you want. >
But what if the slice fails to start ? Will the unit asking for a specific slice (which fails to start) be moved into another slice ? It seems that whatever the final destination used by systemd, the constraints used by the "fallback" slice won't be correct, no ? Thanks -- Francis _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
