If you only want one instance running, why not just create one service and reconfigure/restart it?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015, 09:04 Johannes Ernst <johannes.er...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a foo@.service. When started as > systemctl start foo@abc > I’d like all other currently active foo@… services to stop, and vice > versa. All of the foo@.services are supposed to be mutually exclusive > with each other. > > In foo@.service, I attempted: > Conflicts: foo@.service > but that does not seem to do the trick (Starting foo@abc produces > "Dependency Conflicts=foo@abc.service dropped”) > > I’d like to avoid having to enumerate foo@abc, foo@def etc. in the > Conflicts section. > > Ideas? > > Thanks, > > > > Johannes. > > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel