Grr, my first reply should have gone to the mailing list... 2015-11-08 21:03 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de>: > On Sun, 08.11.15 19:40, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> 2015-11-08 19:10 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: >> > Heya! >> > >> > At systemd.conf we discussed whether we can remove the unit dependency >> > types RequiresOverridable= and RequisiteOverridable=. I am pretty sure >> > they are pretty much unused in the wild, and hard to grok at all, and >> > hence, in order to clean things up a bit, we should really get rid of >> > it. >> >> https://codesearch.debian.net shows a few hits: >> >> RequiresOverridable= >> https://codesearch.debian.net/perpackage-results/RequiresOverridable/2/page_0 >> → golang-github-coreos-go-systemd, dracut, systemd-ui, fleet >> >> RequisiteOverridable= >> https://codesearch.debian.net/perpackage-results/RequisiteOverridable/2/page_0 >> → mandos, systemd-ui, golang-github-coreos-go-systemd, fleet >> >> >> The only interesting cases are probably dracut's rootfs-generator.sh >> using RequiresOverridable
Do you have any concerns regarding dracut? Harald, this is probably for you and mandos using RequisiteOverridable. > > Hmm, how does the usage in "mandos" look like? http://sources.debian.net/src/mandos/1.7.1-1/mandos.service/?hl=11#L11 > I'd probably make RequiresOverridable= a legacy alias for Requires= > when removing it. Would this break anything? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel