Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> on Wed, 2015/11/04 15:55: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 04.11.15 15:54, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > 04.11.2015 00:04, Andrew Jones пишет: > > > >afaict, this will fix a regression caused by commit 75f86906c5. > > > >Where we used to report "kvm" before that patch, without this patch, > > > >we would only report "qemu". > > > > > > Are you sure it is regression? QEMU is a program (platform) while KVM is > > > technology. Modern VirtualBox can use KVM as PV interface but it still > > > remains VirtualBox. QEMU may use KVM as PV interface but it still > > > remains QEMU. > > > > > > Where does it matter? Is anything broken because of this change? > > > > I am pretty sure that vbox should be reported as vbox even if it uses > > kvm as backend. qemu-kvm should be reported as kvm, and any other qemu > > as qemu. > > > > As I understand it, VirtualBox doesn't use KVM as *backend*; it only > exposes a KVM-like paravirt interface to *guests*.
It does use kvm since version 5.0. -- main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/* Chris get my mail address: */=0;b=c[a++];) putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig */b/42*2-3)*42);}
pgpHcb6_mOMPF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel