On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:17:51AM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: >> Splitting it out increases that potential and will allow >> systemd-bootchart to evolve out of cycle again, and look a bit over >> the fence. I've reviewed most of the changes to it, and noticed a bit >> of a drop of risky commits, and those are the ones that are going to >> be needed for this project to make it a useful tool in the future. >> >> So, I think this is a great move, one that certainly will motivate me >> to engage more deeply again :) > Hi Auke, > > what kind of big changes would you have in mind? > Just the fact of being in one repo with systemd should not have > much effect on changes to bootchart which is mostly standalone...
I have been asked on several occasions to make bootchart more palatable for other OS's, including ChromeOS and even Android. This has previously been shelved entirely, and I don't know if it's currently even feasible, but at least logistically it should be a lot easier to attempt. The rest of the things I was looking at were items that being in-tree did not affect, like new ways of grouping the process bars, better IO visualization, etc. Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel