Hi, Please see this thread http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/35437, and for that usecase, the suggestion to do shutdown did work fine, and with that I was able to handle this case.
At that time, the other request I had was if sd_pid_notify_with_fds or equivalent could be enhanced to explictly ask systemd to forgot some FDs, as I felt that would be useful in situations where systemd is being used as FD store, and the FDs that are being stored may not always support shutdown type of activity. > >> Normally one would solve this by inserting shutdown(fd, SHUT_RDWR) at >> the right place, since that *really* terminates the connection, >> regardless if anyone else has an fd open still. Is that an option >> here? >> > > I didn't actually try that myself but that was the 2nd thing that I > suggested when I got the original problem report and the developer who > reported the problem told me that it didn't work. > >> >> Thanks Jana
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
