Am 15.04.2016 um 18:02 schrieb Xen:
Reindl Harald schreef op 15-04-16 17:55:so 3 seconds is unacceptable and the idea ist a joke in general because you wait for something possibly happen while you don't know how long you have to wait and jsut hope for luck - that's not a good design and won't bew accepted anywhereYou are the only one taking 3 seconds seriously as something to hang onto just so you can say that I am full of shitit don't matter *how long* you wait for something you don't know if it ever appears and how long it take to appear - periodThat's why you *don't* and you just proceed with it in line with the current booting of the system, you just postpone the renaming to a later stage where you rename all in one go, instead of each time a device is discovered
* you don't know *when* that later is * until that has happened all other services have to wait * this won#t work in real life * if it would work that way it would have been implementedHONESTLY: i *hate* that predictable stuff too, i don't need it, i disable it and would prefer that the ones who *really* need it has to enable it instead you need to touch your config on the majority of machines which have only one NIC (since current mainboards don't have dualport NICs as some yaers ago)
BUT: i would be careful to pretend i have a doable solution which works for *all* usecases when people working for many years on the kernel did not found one
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
