On Tue, 17.05.16 18:09, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2016-05-17 10:36 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > > On Mon, 16.05.16 04:24, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > >> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require > >> 300K+ ? > >> What's up with systemd-analyze? > > > > it embedds much of PID1's logic actually, in order to do unit file > > checking. > > > >> Could we move more common functionality into a shared, private library > >> to counter the constant growth? > > > > This has been discussed, and yeah, this should be a good thing to > > do. It's just a matter of doing it. A shared, but explicitly private > > library would be good. I figure it should be built from the stuff in > > src/shared and src/basic. This would mean it won't help in the > > systemd-analyze in case, but I think it's OK, given that that's a > > debugging tool. > > Looks like this is not quite that simple. I fiddled with this for a > bit without any success. > We have quite a bit of noinst libs atm [1]. > Would you turn all those into pkglib_LTLIBRARIES? > Merge them into a single lib (or maybe two: libudev-internal and > libsystemd-internal?)
Well, again, I'd really focus on basic and shared and turn them into one lib. Stuff like libcore is only used by PID 1 and systemd-analyze and hence not worth sharing I would say. And things like libmachine-core only exists in order to make test cases that test the machined sources easy. The library is used only by a single binary that is actually also installed. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel