On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
> Well, personally I am not convinced that a policy of "automatic time-based > degrading" is a good default policy, and that a policy of "require > manual intervention to proceed with degrading" is a better default > policy. I think that's true, otherwise it second guesses the default behavior of Btrfs when a volume's devices aren't all present. But conversely right now there is no way to proceed with manual intervention. > > That all said, I am sure in many setups such an automatic degrading is > useful too, but I am also sure that any fancier policies like that > really shouldn't be implemented in systemd, but via some daemon or so > shipped in btrfs-progs really. That's being floated on the Btrfs list also. The caveat is this ends up looking something like LVM's dmeventd or mdadm --monitor daemon. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel