Lennart Poettering wrote in message <20170215172159.GA10587@gardel-login>:
> Sorry, but this is unlikely to be added. I understand that this would be > handy, but this is semantically very questionable, as this would be > transition from privileged code into unprivileged code, and that's > something we can't really have. Ok, I understand, I'll just parse /run/user/*/systemd to get the active users (loginctl list-users is not very machine friendly) > systemd is not really a battery manager, use services like upower for > that, which do provide similar hooks. Fair enough. But I don't really see the point to have a daemon that will just listen to udev events for power change (udevd does other things which I do not need). I prefer my solution which calls directly systemd services. Thanks, Damien Robert _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
