please keep repsonses on the list
Am 22.02.2017 um 15:42 schrieb Ian Pilcher:
On 02/21/2017 08:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
since this should be all on the LAN side something is *very* unusual on
your setup - the firewall i setup at office is just a virtual machine
with a single NIC and is able to do NAT and filtering as well as
traffic-shaping (limit all workstations together to 80% of the WAN line)
with a single IP address - so i don't see any reason why your firewall
can't forward packages to your router independent of the WAN state on
the other side of the router
It's not a matter for forwarding packets to a *router*. I'm trying to
get packets to go to the cable modem, which listens on that 192.168.X.X
address - regardless of the actual public subnet
but i don't understand why it has a different IP address depending on
the state of the WAN side - normally you talk to your modem over the LAN
"If I lose connectivity, however, my firewall doesn't have a default
route" - solve that
https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-creating-or-adding-new-network-alias-to-a-network-card-nic/
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
