Thanks, for explanation. > - a collection of rpms, like a linux distro, including systemd.rpm, > libcryptsetup.rpm, and thousands of other loosely coupled rpms > → that's a mere aggregation, each of the thousands of components carries > it's own license, each has to be satisfied separately
It is mere aggregation as long as binary from systemd.rpm does not link to a library from libcryptsetup.rpm. If it does then it's a combination or a derivative work in terms of GPL and as such the systemd.rpm should include a GPL license (and of course comply with other GPL terms and conditions). Is that correct? Krzy _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
