Why? I think that will be more insured in case the status is not correct.
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????: "Lennart Poettering"<lenn...@poettering.net>;
????????: 2017??6??28??(??????) ????6:48
??????: "????"<624001...@qq.com>;
????: "systemd-devel"<systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
????: Re: ?????? [systemd-de vel] systemctl can't execute stop
actually,whenservice is started by other way
On Wed, 28.06.17 16:38, ???? (624001...@qq.com) wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Is there a way to execute stop actually, even the status is inactive.
No there is not. system will only allow stopping of services that are
actually started.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
