Do you have any extra reads to get a better idea why you consider net_cls not a real cgroup?
Its generally used in iptables and tc traffic labeling an QoS. Its a missing feature with an open issue that can be solved/eased in couple of lines of code https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11618 Are PR welcome for this kind of feature? On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:25 AM Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Di, 26.11.19 15:27, Andrew Gurinovich (altm...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > What is the recommended way to assign cgroups prop net_cls.classid to a > > systemd service? > > Seems that a rule of thumb that whatever service property that is > supposed > > to be systemd-managed, got a property in service file. However, > > https://systemd.io/CGROUP_DELEGATION says that: > > > > >>This means systemd currently does not and will never manage the > following > > controllers on cgroup v1: freezer, cpuset, net_cls, perf_event, net_prio, > > hugetlb. > > > > Do It mean I'm on my own and need to write a custom ExecStartPost shell > > script to handle cgroups creation and cleanup myself just to change a > > single cgroup argument? > > Yes. > > These controllers are not supported by systemd, and this will not > change (at least for their cgroupsv1 implementations) even with > current systemd versions. On cgroupsv2, we now support "cpuset" > starting with the upcoming v244 of systemd, and "freezer" is currently > pending as PR. The other 4 do not exist and have no future on cgroupsv2. > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Berlin >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
