>>destruction of the innocent as long as we can catch the occasional drug >>cheating criminal
I may have missed the post which discussed this, but exactly how can we say for sure that a large number of those who are caught are innocent? Because they say so? Because they have narcolepsy? Because they had a wild evening involving beer and other activities? Because they drank some new energy drink or had colds? Does testing really only catch the "occasional" cheater, versus a rash of innocent bystanders? Or rather, is each person caught spinning a wild excuse in hopes of finding a loophole to escape the consequences of their nefarious actions? I'm not convinced that the statistics are as you insinuate. --JRM
