I am waiting for a reply to this question from someone who might know the answer to this, but what does the following mean? Was there not a B sample positive on Young? Or, does this mean only one athlete from the U.S. 2000 OT tested positive for nandrolone?
* A review of documents related to the case indicates that only one sample from the USATF championships on June 26, 1999 came back positive for nandrolone, at levels at least 30 times greater than the legal limit, perhaps as high as 50 times greater. A definitive reading has not surfaced. * "Martin J. Dixon" wrote: > Walt Murphy shipped this around apparently: > > "The USOC has handed down a three-part series of sanctions, including > the suspension of about $3 million that flows annually from the USOC to > USATF." > > http://www.latimes.com/sports/olympics/la-sp-track17jan17,1,5590302.story?coll=la-headlines-sports-olympics