In a message dated 2/21/01 4:28:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Well, like metrics, we've done this thread amny times before too.  And I'll 
>  say again what I always say: Team Track will never catch on.
>  
>  It will not catch on for the same reason that Team Tennis never caught on. 
 
>  Track and tennis are both intrinsically *individual* sports.  There are 
>  relays, but those are just one more event.  The track "team" does not 
>  compete as a unit in a central game.  Instead we add up a bunch of scores 
>  from individual competitions and call it a team score.
>  
>  When the Lakers and Jazz play each other, you know that Shaq and Malone 
will 
> 
>  be shoving each other under the basket for the rebounds. Each will be 
>  running plays with their respective teammates.  But when the "Indiana 
>  Invaders" face the "LA Lions" in track, Kennedy and Godina might as well 
all 
> 
>  be standing on different continents for all the direct competing they will 
>  be doing against each other.
>  
>  If NBA basketball were played the same way as team track, you would have 
two 
> 
>  opposing guards face each other in a free throw shooting contest.  The 
>  centers would stage a slam dunk competition.  And for the final event the 
>  forwards would compete in a rousing game of HORSE.  Then the individual 
>  scores from each of these events would be added up to determine which 
"team" 
> 
>  won the "basketball meet".
>  
>  I say give it up.  Track is simply not a true team sport.  If it were they 
>  would give Olympic gold medals to all members of the winning team as they 
do 
> 
>  in basketball and soccer.  But it's not, so they give separate medals in 
>  each event, as they should.
>  
>  Kurt Bray
>  
Why does it work for Gymnastics and it sure seemed important and exciting at 
my collegiate conference track championships. 

Reply via email to