I guess Webb could break the HS 5k record and beat Ritz since it is "only"
4:25 pace which is 30 secs slower than his best. MIght as well give Webb the
HS 10k record while we are at it.
Alan
>From: "Mitchell Clair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Mitchell Clair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: t-and-f: Webb vs. Ritz
>Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 21:32:19 -0400
>
>at 4:15, webb is more than 20 seconds slower than his best. he's quite
>comfortable and won't be dropped. with 300 to go he's gone. i love ritz,
>but
>this would not be his race.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Saturday, June 30, 2001 6:49 PM
>Subject: t-and-f: Webb vs. Ritz
>
>
> >i was surpised at how few people rose to the bait on that one; figured
>everybody would have an opinion.
> >
> >I'm also surprised at how many people cited XC as an argument for Ritz.
>XC
>running isn't remotely the same as track, and while Ritz clearly has had an
>upper hand in that department, my money says that Webb cleans his clock on
>the track at 2M.
> >
> >For a direct parallel, see Jim Ryun vs. Gerry Lindgren in the '68 NCAA
>Indoor 2M (the only championship loss of Lindgren's college career). Speed
>wins at that distance.
> >
> >gh
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
