The Electronic Telegraph
Saturday 21 July 2001
Owen Slot




TEN MONTHS after the Sydney Olympics, controversy is set to haunt the Games
with the revelation that the American athletics team included an athlete who
failed a drugs test.

The identity of the athlete has not been revealed but the American
federation, USA Track and Field, are facing extreme pressure to disclose the
name. If it is a medal-winning athlete, he or she faces the prospect of
having to return the medal.

The scandal dates back to Sydney when USATF were charged with running an
inadequate drug-testing system and it was revealed that 17 cases of positive
tests had been kept under wraps. At the time, USATF responded by insisting
that not one of those 17 were competing in the Olympics. This has now been
proven to be wrong.

The issue will come to a head in Edmonton in a week when the world governing
body, the IAAF, will convene before the World Championships. The athlete in
question may be intending to compete in Edmonton; an embarrassing
last-minute withdrawal could be on the cards.

"We have to know who it is," said Arne Ljungqvist, the senior vice-president
of the IAAF. "They have to tell us. This is new and extremely unpleasant
news. I'm very worried because I do not know who it is. If we had to, we
would take every necessary step to make that athlete withdraw from
Edmonton."

Questions remain over the commitment of USATF to ban cheating athletes.
Following the allegations against USATF that were levelled in Sydney, an
independent commission under Richard McLaren, a Canadian lawyer, was
appointed to investigate their drug-testing procedures. McLaren published
his findings last week and found the USATF guilty of failing to "assure that
no doping cases were ignored or suppressed".

The commission criticised USATF for interpreting athletes' privacy
protections so broadly that "its effect was to prevent the IAAF from
enforcing their own doping controls on an international level. . .their
policy of non-disclosure was, in the commission's view, inconsistent with a
stated serious commitment to combat doping."

USATF claim that the 17 cases were all dealt with at home and that the
mystery athlete who tested positive and then competed in Sydney was found to
have been innocent of any offence. But since USATF failed to declare the 17
positives and then refused to deliver any evidence to explain why "the
Sydney one" had been exonerated, the IAAF have no idea whether the rules are
being enforced.

"This is impossible," said Ljungqvist. "We urged them to deliver the
documentation to us. We have to know the full facts. It is a matter of
fairness to the athletes who do not take drugs. I am now asking for all the
facts to be disclosed."

McLaren's report was greeted with a sense of `I told you so' by the IAAF
which was forced to bring public attention to the shortcomings of the
American federation. "I feel vindicated," said Ljungqvist. "I feel I've
evened the score."

Particularly relieved at the report was Professor Christiane Ayotte who runs
the IOC-accredited laboratory in Canada and gave damning evidence to
McLaren. Ayotte claims that she was put under considerable pressure by
USATF. "They felt that since I was only a Quebecois, a Canadian and a woman,
I would be the weakest point in the chain," she said. "It was my credibility
as an expert that they questioned."

Any hopes that USATF might take the report on the chin and make a clean
start were dashed by their swift, official response which challenged the
report's conclusions, saying the investigation went far beyond its scope,
lacked thoroughness and used highly selective statistics.

"Now it is up to USATF to take action and rectify the situation," said
Ljungqvist. "I hope we can start anew but I fear this is not the case
because Craig Masback [USATF chief executive] is saying the Commission are
wrong."

Eamonn Condon
www.RunnersGoal.com

Reply via email to