I think the first questions is, why do you still have a subscription to Runner's World?
Harold Richards wrote: > > My Runner's World, January 2002, tells me how to perform better with drugs. > So, I'm wondering what we really believe about the use of performance > enhancing drugs. Are we telling our youth to take drugs, just not too > much?If caffeine is OK, what about ephedrine? If these two are OK, what > about using both at the same time? > I read in the news that Floyd Heard tested positive for ephedrine and said > that he should have read the label of the package of tea that he drank. Ato > tested positive for ephedrine from an OTC cold medication, according to the > news. We lost an 800 woman runner in the national indoor meet because of a > positive test due to a cold medication. Inger Miller lost her bronze medal > at the World Championships for a positive of caffeine from a soft drink. > So, what is the message? Some is good(Runner's World), more is bad(USADA)? > Do we send the message that female athletes should know their > testosterone/epitestosterone limits and take enough supplements to touch the > limit but not go over the line? > What do we really believe? > Harold > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
