--- Michael Contopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan, the usage of EPO (and I assume other drugs similar to it) are NOT > simple to use effectivley (without dying) by any means.
Two points: 1) I was talking about the taking of it, not the effective use. All I was saying is it is easier to take something than to create reliable tests for its presence. 2) I made no mention of EPO in the post, as I was talking in the most general of terms about intake and testing. As such, the complications of EPO specifically are not really relevant. Dan > >From: Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >--- Buck Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I always chuckle to myself when I read the oft-repeated idea that > > > the athletes are ahead of the testers when it comes to science. > > > >What's so hard to believe about that? If someone can get their hands > on > >the stuff (hypothetically speaking, of course), I assume it takes most > >semi-intelligent people very little science to inject or swallow it. > On > >the other hand, testing for it would take a whole lot more science > beyond > >just creating the drug, assuming the R&D leading to the patent did not > >also include ways of testing for the drug's presence. > > > >Dan ===== http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc. http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy T&F ------------------------------------------------------------ @ o Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED] <|\/ <^- ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) _/ \ \/\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address) / / (503)370-9969 phone/fax __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/
