In a message dated Mon, 13 May 2002 �2:12:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>1) Lancaster, 3:45.57 >>The second Lancaster relay win of the day, Chapple anchoring a >>five-second victory.>> > >Notable for what it missed being - a national record. �I split Lancaster at >2:50.2 through 3 legs - but instead of hammering for a record (remember, >Chapple won the open in 53.35) Chapple (with about a 40-yard cushion) loped >around in 55-point, missing the national record by around 2 seconds. �Que >sera...>> ???? a Federation Record perhaps? Or Texas State record? Certainly nothing near the "real" national record, which is 3:35.72. Dozens of Ca/Pa/NY times faster than 3:43. gh
