Kebba wrote: >>What's most impressive about Krummenacker's >>performances is that he did it while beating some >>folks and not back in 6th or 7th place. I always >>remember Holman running 3:31-3:33 getting mopped.
This is mainly - but not completely - true. Holman had some very fast races back in the pack but also a few fast ones where he was second in very deep fields, mainly during his 1995 European swing. Here is a look at his nine lifetime sub-3:33 1500s: 3:31.52 (6th in Brussels in 1997) 3:31.71 (7th in Zurich in 1997) 3:32.01 (2nd in Monaco in 1995 behind Morceli 3:27.52) 3:32.04 (3rd in Oslo in 1995 behind Niyongabo 3:30.78 and El Guerroudj 3:31.53) 3:32.29 (4th in Nice in 1997 behind El Guerroudj 3:30.32, Kibowen 3:30.44, Taniu 3:31.62) 3:32.48 (4th in Nice in 1995 behind Morcelli 3:27.37, Kemei 3:31.40, Dubus 3:32.37) 3:32.56 (7th in Monaco in 1997) 3:32.71 (2nd in Monaco in 1995 behind Morcelli 3:28.27) 3:32.73 (8th in Zurich in 1995) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes http://autos.yahoo.com
