MJ versus MJ
By MIKE HURST

Sydney Telegraph

Posted by Steve Bennett 
www.oztrack.com

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Michael Johnson declared war on Marion Jones yesterday. MJ versus MJ. The
king of the Olympic track versus the queen of the track.

There hasn't been anything like it in athletics since, well, the 200m and
400m world record-holder Johnson went at it with the (now former) 100m world
record-holder Maurice Greene in early 2000.

But Johnson never threw the low blows at Greene which he landed yesterday on
Marion and her boyfriend the new 100m world record-holder Tim Montgomery.

In his occasional column for London's  Johnson took issue with five-time
Sydney Olympics medallist Jones and Montgomery choosing Charlie Francis as
their consultant. 

Francis coached a former 100m world record-holder, Ben Johnson, whose record
9.79sec was quashed after he failed a drug test at the 1988 Seoul Olympics.
His previous record of 9.83sec was invalidated in 1989 after Francis and,
eventually Johnson, confessed under oath at Canada's Dubin Inquiry to using
steroids when that one was set in 1987.

``I am shocked by her [Jones'] choice of Francis but not at all surprised by
her continued lack of concern for her own reputation,'' Johnson wrote, in
part.

``I don't think Marion makes very good decisions, and she lacks the support
of people able to help her make good decisions.''

He got that much right in this case if he's referring to the lawyers and
Nike image-makers who should have been fighting for the world's fastest
couple to get what they so clearly wanted. 

``Some examples of Marion's poor decision-making last year?'' Johnson
continued.

``Throughout the season she said she had learnt not to take her opposition
for granted [as a result of losing her world title in the 100m in 2001] yet
last summer she took a trip home to the US from Europe for three days `to
sleep in her own bed' during the week between the Brussels and Berlin Golden
League meets, knowing she would face Zhanna Block who took her 100m title
and had pushed her to the wire the previous week in Brussels.''

Johnson always bridled at media criticism of him as an athlete, but now that
he is a TV commentator and newspaper columnist he needs to do his homework
before criticising others. 

In fact, without fanfare, Jones slipped home to the US to take care of the
affairs of her father who had been murdered.

Good one, Michael.

He went on to encourage the Golden League promoters to collude in a clearly
unlawful, improper and actionable exercise against Jones and Montgomery's
rights to earn a living.

``I am now hearing the Golden League meet promoters are considering not
inviting Marion and Tim to their meetings because of their association with
Francis,'' writes Johnson.

``...I hope the Golden League promoters stick to their guns and do not give
in to any pressure from any source.

``These promoters have lived through and suffered from the black eye that
Francis inflicted on athletics with his role in the Ben Johnson scandal
which the sport has still not recovered from 15 years later.''

Was Ben Johnson the only sportsperson with a coach among the thousands who
been doping, many of whom have tested positive over the last 15 years?

What about the East Germans, the Russians, the Chinese and even some
American and British stars who have been doping? Francis had nothing to do
with any of them. He had also stopped coaching Ben in 1988, yet Ben failed
another test at the end of 1992 and was banned for life.

Why has Michael Johnson reserved for Jones the special kind of invective he
usually saves for Greene?

It has long been rumoured Johnson felt unhappy that Nike's poster-girl
received the plums he felt he deserved. Perhaps the attitude displayed in
his column goes a long way to explaining why he did not receive those plums.


Reply via email to