Actually I have given you all the facts that I have during numerous on and "off list" exchanges. And if I'm right, there have been a be a few emails from you, or your colleagues with inside information that was "off list".
Since I respect the confidentiality of my sources, I delete those emails. If I find some, are you suggesting that it's now it's OK to share some of those emails now? malmo -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:31 PM To: track list Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what doyouthinkofMilli Vanilli? cold beer?! Hell, you haven't even worked your way up to a glass of warm spit yet. There are "words" and then there's your speciality; tossing bombs that only serve to stir the shit, not to enlighten or improve the human condition. If you're so eager for "the truth" allow me to suggest that as a world-class athlete who was a member of a top-flight NCAA program and an elite national club--at a time when the drug-taking was far more open than now--you have far more first-hand experience with teammates who were dosing up than the staff of T&FN ever will. As this rabid crusader, you're therefore beholden to go public with the facts. Names, places, dates, substances. The board eagerly awaits your first post along these lines. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. gh > From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:28:12 -0500 > To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do > youthinkofMilli Vanilli? > > I do it for free here. You can owe me a cold beer. > > malmo > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:11 PM > To: track list > Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do > youthinkofMilli Vanilli? > > > OK, 50 it is. What a win-win situation: you don't have to wax > sciolistic and we only have to pay you a tenth the price! > >> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:00:27 -0500 >> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'track list'" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do >> youthinkof Milli Vanilli? >> >> I can't write. Besides I've never been much into verbiage. Pith is >> grand. If you can say it in 50 words, then why waste 450 more on a >> sciolistic smokescreen? >> >> malmo >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ghill >> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:16 AM >> To: track list >> Subject: Re: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do >> youthinkof Milli Vanilli? >> >> >> >> >>> From: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:23:15 -0500 >>> To: "'ghill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'track list'" >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: RE: t-and-f: can I come back now? It depends...what do you >>> thinkof Milli Vanilli? >>> >>> One of the cornerstones of the liberal mind: issues are only issues >>> if >> >>> they are YOUR issues. Perhaps you believe that it's a "discussion" >>> only if you are comfortable with the subject and you call it >>> "yelling" >> >>> if you are not? >>> >>> I believe there are more, rather than fewer, of us who'd like to see >>> some backbone from the "Bible of the Sport". It's your slogan, not >>> ours. >>> >>> malmo-Two-ms: Stentorian? NOT! >>> >> >> OK, Caped Crusader, here's your chance to make a difference. >> >> Instead of wasting your words on the choir here, create some new >> gospel where you apparently think it's truly needed. >> >> Pen a screed of some 500 words of what you think T&FN should have >> been > >> saying all these years and--so long as it doesn't run the risk of >> involving us in a lawsuit--we'll print it in toto. >> >> Sha-zam! >> >> gh >> >> > >
