Reading the Multipolygon page in the wiki, I'm unclear as to exactly what the current best practice is for tagging a mutipoly and its members, which represent a city boundary that has portions of unincorporated county inside it, like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/111828/
1, Is it really correct that the relation has no tags at all? (I added the name tag just to make it easier to find in JOSM) 2. Is it correct that the inner members have no tags at all, instead of maybe tagging them the same as the county boundary, and also adding them to a multipoly for the county? -- Alan Mintz <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging