On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Cyclists aren't allowed on most forest service trails, and those are
> posted horse=no, bicycle=no, foot=yes.  Really, what's wrong with the
> "bicycle=destination" idea I suggested for navigation purposes, without
> trying to supersede common sense (ie, identifying and obeying traffic
> control devices as they're encountered)?

Because I find bicycle=destination meaningless
I might comprehend bicycle=journey in a literature exam or reading poetry
but bicycle=destination I can't get my head around


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to