At 2010-02-03 06:19, Richard Welty wrote: >... >so should a reference route designation that isn't on a sign go in a ref >tag or not? the wiki doesn't >discuss this. if ref shouldn't have this, perhaps a variant on ref is >needed?
I would say the question is "what happens when one of these routes is adopted as a state route and then signed?" If it retains the same route number as this "reference route", and is then signed that way, I would say that ref is the appropriate tag. Otherwise, a separate tag seems correct, since we may ultimately have to carry both IDs. I might put parentheses around the value if it is not currently signed that way. -- Alan Mintz <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
