2010/5/28 Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com>: > Right idea, but from my perspective landuse=* shouldn't be used to > describe an individual feature (like an orphanage), but to describe > the use of an area of land. If you want to do tiered tags like this > you'd use something more like amenity=residential_home + > residential_home=orphanage. > > I.e. an orphanage is a type of residential_home is a type of amenity. > NOT a childrens_home is a type of residential is a type of landuse.
+1, definitely. It's very consistent. Anyway, I moved orphanage proposal to 'rejected' status, We can continue discussion at 'residential_home' proposal (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Residential_home). RFC is open since 2009 but there are still things we need to solve: * name: 'residential_home' or 'assisted_living' (maybe sth. else)? * sub-tagging: 'residents' or main tag value (residential_home=*/assisted_living=*) * sub-tags value 'children'/'seniors'/etc. or 'orphanage'/'nursing home'/etc. (hospice maybe?) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging