2010/8/28 Anthony <o...@inbox.org>: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:56 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> if there is no footway, it shouldn't be tagged as such. > > Agreed. But what is a footway? The dictionary says it's "a narrow > way or path for pedestrians". I don't see anything about grass being > disqualified.
The definition you quoted said: "way or path". In the aerial images posted here there was neither of them. If was just grass. No way. You can actually see informal footways/paths quite well in aerial imagery. If they are there and you have good resolution images. Usually the grass is aside then, because grass doesn't grow where people (or animals) walk. It disappears even if it was there before. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
