Nathan Edgars II wrote: > I'm wondering what the difference is between the recent discussions > about trees and waterways.
Even the opponent(s) of changing the wiki's tree definition didn't try to argue that the wiki definition was better than the alternative. There was disagreement over whether changing it would cause a loss of information, and whether it could be tolerated. With waterways, some actually seem to like the current definition. So the difference is that the wiki definition for natural=tree is quite unanimously considered a bad choice. This makes changing the definition more attractive than trying to increase acceptance of the definition. If the definition itself is considered decent, however, educating mappers and fixing existing errors can be a more appealing option. Tobias Knerr _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
