On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:39:53 +0200 Lennard <l...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > That's one thing I've never really understood with railway=abandoned > either. Sure, many of them have been converted into might fine > cycleways, but that's just what they are now: cycleways.
You can abandon a railway and still have a something on the ground which can be identified, ignoring reuse such as rail-trails. But an abandoned bridge? Is it still a bridge? or is it broken down and unusable - in which case it is not a bridge but a broken down ex-bridge. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
