agreed. there should be no restriction on who owns/provides the service. On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 14:04, <j...@jfeldredge.com> wrote:
> Your proposed changes make sense to me. > > -------Original Email------- > Subject :[Tagging] community centres > From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com > Date :Mon Sep 27 16:02:20 America/Chicago 2010 > > > I happened to stumble over > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre > The definition restricts usage with this sentence "The Community > Centre is owned and provided by the local government." > > The linked wikipedia article > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_centre doesn't for good > reasons: it mentions a lot of those facilities run by religious > communities, which are in most countries not "the local government". > There is also the possibility that a foundation or a political party > run a centre like this. > > I find the restriction to governmental institutions somewhat > unnecessary. What about changing this? We could still encourage the > use of an operator tag to clarify who runs the thing. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging