I do think this is not a real probolem because our Map is never ready, next mapper will correct these previous tags. I'm more worried about hte mappers that think that in *every* cycleway=track situation a seperated way is the best option to map it.
Re-mapping that is a greater problem.

-Robert-

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- From: Georg Feddern
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Robert Elsenaar schrieb:
Peter wrote:
If you tag it as cycleway:both=track, it's more clear.


Yes you are right. But implicite we have accepted several default in our tags.

That's right.
But the problem is, that already hundreds or thousands of cycleway=track
tagged yet - but in reality they are single-side.
That's the eternal problem, if a tagging is refined lately ... or
previous used too early.
So you might know, that you implicite mean both, if you tag it now.
But any user doesn't know, if you really meant that - or if you didn't
care about the late refine of left, right, both - because the tagging
was already done much earlier.

Regards
Georg


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tekst ingevoegd door Panda GP 2011:

Als het hier gaat om een ongevraagde e-mail (SPAM), klik dan op de volgende link om de e-mail te herclasseren: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_1686&SPAM=true&path=C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Global%20Protection%202011\AntiSpam ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to