On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:30 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>wrote:
> In fact the only thing that will be accomplished by removing > references on the wiki is people will use multiple key/value pairs for > the same type of object because they can't see any other values that are > already documented. > > Between the two extremes, completely removing or putting the controversed tag 'event' prominent in the Map Features (where the feedback shows that the tag is far away from a consensus), I tried something new with this intermediate solution where the 'event' page remains in the wiki, is referenced by the 'Key:historic' page and also in one entry 'historic:other values' in the template used by Map Features. Thus if someone is searching the tag in the wiki, he will find it. But he will also notice that it is not considered as a "map feature". This is a lot of efforts to find a compromise to satisfy everyone. You will find anyway in the database much much more undocumented tags than documented tags. So keep the Map Features page for what it has been created. Pieren
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
