2011/5/6 Stefan Bethke <s...@lassitu.de>: >> If you introduce a new class you should define to which vehicles it >> applies. If you can't do it for all countries, do it for your country >> and let others do it for theirs. > > I think you will want to watch the tone you're using.
(?) > Besides, I don't see an exhaustive list of legal vehicle classifications for > any of the other access=* tags, either, so what exactly is it that you demand > of me? well, if you set up a proposal for a "new" class like automobiles, at the current state of access restriction definitions, I'd expect some details where this applies to, but I think that it shouldn't actually be necessary to invent a new class, because motor_car is exactly what you do want to introduce. >> I am opposing the inclusion of busses and trucks in "motorcar", as I >> don't think that this is the common interpretation of this tag >> (whatever the wiki states about it). Let's undo (or revision) this >> edit: 11:39, 14 October 2010 T-i (Talk | contribs) m (12,875 bytes) >> (→Land-based transportation: adjusted hierarchy) >> typical case of wiki fiddling where the meaning of motorcar was >> extended to all those other classes. This was never intended to be >> like this. >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aaccess&action=historysubmit&diff=545364&oldid=542111 >> I undid this, please verify. > > And here's me thinking that the process is to propose a change before > performing it. I wasn't actually "changing", I was reverting to the state that was there for a long time in the English (=official) version. > Have you consulted the user who did that change? I have written to the German ML where I guess he will read about it, because he is German or Swiss. Btw.: I have temporarily reverted my edit because I see that it is not undisputed. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
